DESCRIPTION
|
POINTS
|
1.0
|
Few
technical decisions called for and these will be of routine
nature with ample precedent or clearly defined procedures.
|
35
|
1.5
|
Midpoint
value
|
40
|
2.0
|
Recommendations
limited to solution of the problem rather than end results.
Decisions made are normally within established guidelines.
|
45
|
2.5
|
Midpoint
value
|
50
|
3.0
|
Makes
independent studies, analyses, interpretations and conclusions.
Difficult, complex, or unusual matters or decisions are
usually referred to more senior authority.
|
55
|
3.5
|
Midpoint
value
|
60
|
4.0
|
Recommendations
reviewed for soundness of judgement, but usually accepted
as technically accurate and feasible.
|
70
|
4.5
|
Midpoint
value
|
80
|
5.0
|
Makes
responsible decisions not usually subject to technical review,
on all matters assigned, except those involving large sums
of money or long-range objectives. Takes courses of action
necessary to expedite the successful accomplishment of assigned
projects.
|
90
|
5.5
|
Midpoint
value
|
105
|
6.0
|
Makes
responsible decisions on all matters, including the establishment
of policies and expenditures of large sums of money and/or
implementation of major programs, subject only to overall
policy and financial controls.
|
120
|
6.5
|
Midpoint
value
|
135
|
7.0
|
Responsible
for long-range planning, coordination and making specific
and far-reaching management decisions. Keeps management
associates informed of all matters of significant importance.
|
150
|
JOB RATING FACTORS
A.
DUTIES
... view
B. EDUCATION ... view
C. EXPERIENCE ... view
D. RECOMMENDATIONS, DECISIONS AND COMMITMENTS ... view
E. SUPERVISION RECEIVED ... view
F. LEADERSHIP AUTHORITY AND/OR SUPERVISION EXERCISED ... view
G. SUPERVISION SCOPE ... view
H. PHYSICAL DEMANDS ... view
I. JOB ENVIRONMENT ... view
J. ABSENCE FROM BASE OF OPERATIONS ... view
K. ACCIDENT AND HEALTH HAZARDS ... view
|