The PEGG May 2001 |
|||||
Home | Past PEGGs | Ad Rates | Back to May Index | Contact | |||||
|
THE GLOBAL ENGINEER
|
"When
you look back 15 or 20 years, we have made monumental progress in
licensing. We have moved out of the Dark Ages and into enlightenment.
Maybe with this whole mobility discussion, we will look back five
or seven years from now and say the same thing: that we have made
progress, that it continually got better from there." |
Canadian professional engineering associations signed a mobility agreement
in 1999, allowing engineers mobility between provinces. Geoscientists
in Canada are on the cusp of signing a similar agreement.
Dick Cottingham, P.E., president of the National Council of Examiners
for Engineering and Surveying in the U.S., said he applauds bilateral
efforts and urged provincial associations to continue them. "These
are baby steps in the right direction. But the real key is for the Canadian
Council of Professional Engineers to work with the NCEES," the North
Carolina resident said.
NCEES has adopted a "model law" for testing engineers. Most
states are forming their mobility policies after the model law, Mr. Cottingham
pointed out. And most will also follow the national lead when new mobility
developments arrive.
Most states require in most situations that Canadian engineers provide
references and write examinations. Some criteria
are Catch 22s: Canadian applicants may require references from U.S. engineers
they've worked under, for example. But that can't happen until their application
succeeds.
The forum heard that there are significant differences, state-to-state,
in the powers and procedures of the licensing boards, making it even tougher
on Canadian applicants. Success in one state does not guarantee success
in another.
Some boards are not allowed to lobby their state governments for any changes
to the laws governing engineers. "In my state, we have to be very
cautious. We can't even go to present a board position at the state legislature,"
said Richard Zbinden, president of the Oregon board. The Idaho board,
on the other hand, is a registered lobbyist. And Nebraska has a full-time
staff lobbyist on its payroll.
"Texas
has a vested interest in NAFTA. We're right next to Mexico. Our
president (during the negotiations) was from Texas. And when we
signed in 1995, George W. Bush, today's president, was our governor. |
State-to-province cooperation does exist in the engineering field. Michigan
and Ontario are reaching an agreement. Maine and New Brunswick have had
an unwritten agreement for years, the forum heard.
In the western provinces, APEGGA has put engineering mobility on the agenda
of PNWER, the Pacific Northwest Economic Region. PNWER pushes for economic
cooperation in Alberta, B.C., Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana and Alaska,
and has government as well as private sector representation.
Texas is the only U.S. state that has embraced NAFTA when it comes to
mobility. The Lone Star State
board is allowed to waive all or part of its examinations, on 12 years
experience if the applicant graduated from an accredited university, or
16 years from a non-accredited university.
David Dorchester, P.E., chair of the Texas board, said it's important
that a board have real power. "If you can't make a judgment call,
you don't need a board, in my opinion," he said.