Compliance Extends Beyond APEGGA's Membership
As Director of Registration and Compliance, Dave Todd, P.Eng.,
doesn't just keep his eye on those already within the APEGGA
corral. APEGGA is empowered to remedy and even prosecute
violations of the Engineering, Geological and Geophysical
Professions (EGGP) Act by persons or corporations not belonging
to APEGGA.
The intent of all APEGGA compliance initiatives is to safeguard
the public by ensuring that those offering professional
engineering, geological or geophysical services are qualified and
properly licenced to do so. While APEGGA cannot apply its
discipline process to those who are not members, there is a range
of actions, up to and including prosecution under the Criminal
Code, which can be applied to compliance violations.
Non-compliance can occur in several ways, for instance, when:
Sometimes such transgressions are the inadvertent outcome of
ignorance or they may be the deliberate consequence of deceit or
fraud. (Please see columns by Enforcement Review Committee Chair
Darcie Greggs, P.Geol., in this month's _ this page _ and next
month's PEGG.)
Where the parties are unaware that they have contravened the Act,
they simply may be asked to desist. For instance, matters may be
set right by a "plant engineer", who is not a
registered engineer, referring to himself or herself by another
label, perhaps "plant superintendent". Or those having
the credentials for professional membership in APEGGA could
become members and retain the "plant engineer" title.
In other instances, engineers or geoscientists living and working
in Alberta may be registered with a sister association but not
with APEGGA. A letter reminding of the requirement to belong to
APEGGA if practicing in Alberta may be all that's needed to
obtain compliance.
Along with sister associations across Canada, APEGGA exchanges
names of members living outside their respective jurisdictions.
Under APEGGA's compliance program, letters are sent to such
individuals, if they are living in Alberta, reminding them of the
requirement to obtain APEGGA membership if they are practicing in
this province, and if they are using "engineer" in job
titles or using the designation "P.Eng." Provincial and
territorial associations and the Canadian Council of Professional
Engineers are co-ordinating efforts to curb and/or prosecute the
use by non-engineers (as happened within the computer industry)
of terms such as "network engineer" and "certified
systems engineer".
Since the hiring in early 1997 of Compliance Coordinator Jo-Ann
Marshall, who has a paralegal background, and the hiring a year
ago of Compliance Secretary Louise Heron, the Compliance
Department has increased its proactive approach to enforcement
and has doubled its active files. The same reporting periods late
in 1996 and 1998 revealed that the open files had more than
doubled from 107 in 1996, to 292 in 1998. This increased activity
has resulted in the issuance of Permits to Practice increasing
from 34 in 1996 to 72 in 1998. Those corporations that have names
which violate the EGGP Act have also been impacted. In 1996, only
four corporations changed their name voluntarily versus 21 by
Dec. 1, 1998. As for individuals using restricted titles, 12
ceased to use those titles in 1996, with 57 having ceased in
1998; only one completed registration in 1996 but 78 have
registered in 1998. APEGGA's current focus on the qualified and
unregistered geoscientists is hoped to have the same effect by
increasing registration of geoscientists currently practicing
without registration. Mr. Todd and his staff follow up member
complaints and monitor the Alberta Gazette, daily newspapers and
other sources for improper corporate or individual use of the
terms engineering, geology or geophysics. Agreements also have
been worked out with Alberta's Corporate Registry and the
publishers of the Yellow Pages to alert APEGGA when firms using
those terms register under the Business Corporations Act or
request aYellow Pages listing.Again, the issue may be resolved by
the firm changing its name or, where appropriate, taking out a
Permit to Practice. Some 80 per cent of compliance cases are
fairly straight forward and are handled directly by APEGGA staff.
Mr. Todd compares the enforcement process to bill collecting with
consistent follow-up providing the key to compliance.
"Even when there may be some reluctance, when push comes to
shove, in most cases an individual or a company will
comply," he explains
.
There are instances when heavier artillery may be needed _ such
as prosecution under Section 81 of the EGGP Act, through the
Attorney General's Department if criminal offences, such as
fraud, appear to have been committed, or through court
injunctions to stop illegal practice under Section 9 of the EGGP
Act.
Besides providing valued eyes and ears ever-alert to compliance
violations, APEGGA's Enforcement Review Committee is a source of
support and guidance to staff. This is particularly true, when
issues are less clear-cut or when moves to obtain compliance are
resisted or require legal action.